Tube City Almanac

March 03, 2005

Ask Not For Whom The Bell Tolls, Kaufmann's

Category: default || By jt3y

In Our Fair City it was Cox's, in Washington, it was Lang's and Caldwell's, and in Greensburg it was Troutman's. Every city with pretensions to importance had a fancy department store. Those that actually were important had several; Youngstown, for instance, had Strouss's and McKelvey's. Pittsburgh had Kaufmann's, Joseph Horne Co., Gimbels, and others.

Remember the bells that used to call clerks to various departments? Bong. Bong-bong-bong-bong. It meant someone was needed in department 14. Those bells are playing a funeral dirge right now.

Naturally, the news that Downtown Picksberg's last remaining department store, Kaufmann's, is about to be swallowed by Macy's is sending a few people into spasms. And if you think Pittsburghers are upset, in Chicago --- where they're liable to lose Marshall Field's, a name that is as synonymous with the Windy City as the Cubs --- they're practically in apoplexy.

The problem is that the department stores have lost their relevancy, and while I've read a lot of things this week blaming Wal-Mart, Target, and the other usual suspects for the decline and fall of great names like Kaufmann's, as far as I'm concerned, Federated Department Stores and May Department Stores have no one to blame but themselves.

Appropriately for a guy who's writing a history of G.C. Murphy Co., I've always been interested in retailing, and I've read histories of Macy's, Dayton's, Hudson's, Gimbels and the others. These department stores always competed with the "discounters" of their eras --- Woolworth's or Murphy's or McCrory's --- and their prices were always higher. The reason their prices were higher, as Max Hess of the Hess's Department Store chain in Allentown explains in his book "Every Dollar Counts," was that they offered ridiculously high levels of service.

A customer who approached a counter at Macy's or Gimbels or Hess's back in the old days could count on being swarmed with attentive clerks. Hapless husbands would enter the lingerie department, tell the salesgirl "my wife is about your size," and she'd devote an hour to finding exactly what he wanted. Clerks kept files on the sizes and style preferences of their regular customers, so they didn't have to guess what they wanted --- they knew. Lose your credit card? Horne's would look up the number. Need a suit in an emergency after store hours? Chances are that someone at Kaufmann's would open the store for you. All of the bigger stores offered personal shopping services; many also had travel agencies, and some even offered rental cars.

There's a famous story about a fire in a Neiman-Marcus store that destroyed a bunch of wedding gowns on a Friday night --- hours before the brides were supposed to pick them up for their Saturday weddings. Neiman-Marcus flew in seamstresses and gowns from other stores and fitted them to the brides on Saturday morning, with time to spare.

Do you think that would happen today? Maybe at Neiman-Marcus, which like Nordstrom's on the West Coast, still has a reputation for going above and beyond the call of duty. But I was in a Kaufmann's not long ago, looking for a small gift for a lady friend. It was an effort to tear the clerk at the jewelry counter away from her telephone call, and then it was an effort to get her to show me anything. Her attitude was --- can't you see it from the aisle way? Not at those prices, no, I couldn't.

And good luck finding a salesperson in men's wear or any of the other departments where items are "on the rack," so to speak. Gee, Kaufmann's: If I've got to find the clothes myself, and schlep them to the counter, and you're not going to do any alterations, then I might as well go out to Syms and save 25 percent off of your prices, huh? (Lordy, lordy, do I miss Kadar's, where Len and Dorothy knew my sizes, my tastes --- or lack thereof --- and alterations were always free.)

A lot of the services in these department stores disappeared, I suspect, when the names on the front doors ceased to mean anything. The clerks at Cox's were responsible to "Mr. Robert" and "Mr. William" (William and Robert Cox, that is), not to a nameless board of directors in Cincinnati or St. Louis. The decline of Gimbels can be directly traced to the time when the last of the Gimbel family left the company and it was sold to British-American Tobacco; and I'll wager that the decline of Kaufmann's, Horne's, and all of the others began when the founding families gave up control.

The stockholders want higher profits; overhead, like attentive clerks, eats up profits. So they've laid off much of the help and replaced the old-time clerks with younger people who can be paid less money, and who have less invested in the store. They've also cheapened the merchandise to the point where the shirt you buy in Kaufmann's isn't necessarily better than the one you can get out at Kohl's or Target. The problem is they haven't lowered the prices commensurately with the drop in service or quality. As a result, the department stores have shot off their own feet.

The other problem is that the conglomeration of little chains into May Department Stores and Federated Department Stores --- which is not a new trend; it dates to the 1930s --- has left individual stores standing for absolutely nothing distinctive.

For a long time after Kaufmann's became a part of the May Company, and Horne's became part of Associated Dry Goods, the stores maintained their individuality. A Kaufmann's store in Pittsburgh didn't look like a May Company store in Los Angeles, and Lazarus in Columbus, Ohio, was different from Goldwater's in Phoenix. That's because these stores maintained their own local buyers and marketers, and they tailored their stores, their merchandise, and their advertising to their communities.

But all that individuality cost money, too. So the chains eliminated it. Now an L.S. Ayres looks like a Hecht's looks like a Kaufmann's. Take a look at the websites for the different May Company stores if you don't believe me; they're identical except for the names. And they're all identically dull.

Thus, under the thumb of Wall Street pension fund managers, actuaries, accountants and other bean-counters, all of those once-great department stores have become bland and overpriced. This may have helped the stock prices of Federated or May --- for a little while, anyway --- but dull and expensive is not a sustainable business model. It didn't even work for Rolls-Royce, which has been split up and sold piecemeal to the Germans.

While I can get nostalgic for the old department stores, I have no nostalgia for the present state that they're in. They're not dying; in point of fact, they died 20 years ago and just haven't been buried yet.

Perhaps the corpses of Federated's and May's old soldiers --- Marshall Fields and Hecht's and yes, Kaufmann's --- can still be reanimated, but some how, I doubt that consolidating these massive, faceless companies into an even bigger conglomerate is the jolt of electricity that is going to do the job.






Your Comments are Welcome!

Excellent analysis. Witness the growth of online shopping, even for clothes. If retailers still offered the level of service you describe, people wouldn’t be sending credit card numbers into cyberspace for merchandise they can’t even try on until they’ve purchased it.
Jonathan Potts (URL) - March 03, 2005




I agree with Mr. Potts—nice job, Mr. T.
I actually had some experience working in a department store in downtown—at Horne’s, in fact. This was close to twenty years ago, and I went through the requisite training and worked in Men’s Shirts, on the first floor. The highlight of my brief tenure was selling Jon Burnett and Yvonne Zanos some shirts.
But I didn’t last long at the job, because it didn’t pay jack. And I can’t help but wonder if the poor pay isn’t part of the reason why customer service has gone so far to the wayside. Aren’t we Americans coddled, and so generically “middle class” that most of us disdain customer service jobs? We look down on the job and the person who holds the job, and often, that job ends up being eliminated.
So perhaps all of the blame can’t be put on Corporate.
Jonathan Barnes - March 03, 2005




An outstanding piece.

If I may borrow from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, I believe the hands on the famous downtown Kaufmann’s clock are now at two minutes to midnight.
A. Lert Reader - March 05, 2005




Very accurate assessment to say the least! I live in Rochester NY, and we lost the very best of our hometown department stores in Sibley’s (a May Co. store) back in 1990 when all stores in the chain here in upstate NY were merged into Kaufmann’s. The downtown Rochester flagship store at well over 125 years old was one of the most beautifully detailed stores of its kind anywhere (the building is in excellent condition for tis age today), was closed as part of the merger! One of the advantages cited at the time was that Kaufmann’s sales per square foot were slightly higher than Sibley’s and that level of performance could be duplicated with the change…..So this is perhpas the last refrain to the same old song as you’ve noted. The new Federated-May organization is definitiely racing against time trying to maintain an unsustainable business model predicated on high price, dubious quality, and detestable service. Many of these low paid “store associates” a.k.a. as department store salespersons can be downright rude and exhibit somewhat benign service skills at best.
MC - April 30, 2005




I think anyone over 40 years of age will agree completely with your analysis. What I find amazing is that the most “old fashioned” customer service I now receive is from the good Internet sites. When I visit amazon.com they remember me, my favorites, make suggestions on what I might like and tell me what other customers thought of a book I’m considering. You can’t find that kind of personal service at most retail stores anymore.
Brian C - March 17, 2006




I just recently came across your blog post after searching for information on Kaufmann’s. I am too young to enjoy the ‘hey day’ of the department store boom, where Kaufmann’s was as unique to Pittsburgh at the Steelers, but as a Pittsburgher I find myself continuing to lose the traditional identity to this great city. Your post hit a cord that, I admit, made me tear up. Quality and concern for shoppers has been buried with those traditional stores we yearn for.

I wonder what life will be like when I have children. The memories of Kaufmann’s window displays and Santaland – will I even have a chance to do that at Macy’s, or whatever the store may be called, with my children?

This is a small situation into a large, global issue of losing quality for humans. Forget the terrorists and the violence, tearing away our attention to detail is far more bothersome.
Bobbo (URL) - December 19, 2006




To comment on any story at Tube City Almanac, email tubecitytiger@gmail.com, send a tweet to www.twitter.com/tubecityonline, visit our Facebook page, or write to Tube City Almanac, P.O. Box 94, McKeesport, PA 15134.